ALIREZA BEYGI; ALIREZA BEYGI; Ramin Valizadeh Meidani
Abstract
The Bahraini government tried to suppress the Bahraini people's movement on February 14, 2011, with the trial of mostly Shi'ite leaders. The political defenses of February 14th leaders in the Bahraini military tribunals can be seen as another area of continuation of political contention against the government, ...
Read More
The Bahraini government tried to suppress the Bahraini people's movement on February 14, 2011, with the trial of mostly Shi'ite leaders. The political defenses of February 14th leaders in the Bahraini military tribunals can be seen as another area of continuation of political contention against the government, so that the trial of revolutionary leaders has become a confrontation between two discourses. This article seeks to elucidate and analyze the attitudes of the leaders of the February 14th Bahrain Movement. Indeed, this study, by analyzing the discourse of the Bahraini leadership's defenses, is seeking to answer the question that the leaders of the February 14th movement, who have been in Bahrain since 2011, how do they defend themselves in response to al-Khalifa's allegations? The results of this paper, which are descriptive-analytic and library-based sources, show that these individuals have used the most from the use of quantitative and qualitative variables from vocabulary, metaphor and interests cases to defend themselves. The reason for this is the social position of the leaders, their level of knowledge and skills in speech and writing, because they all had high level of science and most of them are the leaders of the political groups and have been associated with different classes and groups. In the end, this research will express the imagined horizon facing this movement and will explain the type of political structure of power that has emerged in Bahraini society.
hasan majidi; mohsen rahiminia
Abstract
This article tries to address the issues of the eleventh presidential election, and discusses the conduct of Dr. Hassan Rouhani's election discourse as a candidate for the presidential election of the eleventh period, and to answer by means of discourse analysis method the question of "how the hegemony ...
Read More
This article tries to address the issues of the eleventh presidential election, and discusses the conduct of Dr. Hassan Rouhani's election discourse as a candidate for the presidential election of the eleventh period, and to answer by means of discourse analysis method the question of "how the hegemony of the discourse of moderation in the eleventh presidential election is explained? In this research, our claim is that t The claim of the article is that the components of the victorious candidate discourse in the eleventh presidential election are more based on the diverse articulation of different slogans, myths and alteration in its relation to the discourse governing the tenth government, the availability and credibility of the discourse of moderation in society and having a political subjectivity can be analyzed. The findings of this paper show that the discourse of moderation in the discursive struggle was more hegemonic due to the position of subjectivity and political subjectivity, more active and coherent, the use of the process of marginalization and highlighting, more effective access and credibility than other competing discourses.
Abstract
شکل گیری اخیزش2011 مصر،موجب شد تا نظامی از تداخل گفتمانی در این کشور شکل گرفته و نوعی از تقابل و تعامل را بین سکولارها با مسلک دموکراتیک و اقتدارگرایی و همچنین اسلام گرایان ...
Read More
شکل گیری اخیزش2011 مصر،موجب شد تا نظامی از تداخل گفتمانی در این کشور شکل گرفته و نوعی از تقابل و تعامل را بین سکولارها با مسلک دموکراتیک و اقتدارگرایی و همچنین اسلام گرایان با دو مرام یادشده، شاهد باشیم.از این رو،شاهد شکل گیری مجموعه ای از گفتمان هاییم که در نزاع با هم، سعی در به حاشیه رانی رقیب و تثبیت نظام معنایی خود داشته اند.یکی از این گفتمانها،گفتمان سکولار اقتدارگرا می باشد.بدین ترتیب،سؤال اینجاست که معنا و مفهوم گفتمان یادشده و همچنین مؤلفه های آن کدامند و چه گروه ها و احزابی از آن پیروی می کنند؟. پاسخ بدین پرسش با روش لاکلایی، اینگونه گشت که گفتمان مزبور سعی دارد تا دالهایی چون توسعه اقتصادی،حقوق شهروندی و کرامت انسانی،مبارزه با تروریسم،عدالت اجتماعی و استقلال در سیاست خارجی را به وسیله ی دال مرکزی «امنیت» معنابخشی کرده و هویتی جدید بیافریند.نظامیان مصر که از همین منطق گفتمانی پیروی می کنند،توانستند تا با امنیتی سازی مصر و به زور شمشیر ، گفتمان رقیبشان را به حاشیه رانده و خود را هژمون سازند.
